Wednesday, November 17, 2010
The Printing Press
In the last decade the two countries to have used this route were japan and Zimbabwe, both have failed miserably to revive their economy through quantitative easing. The increase in money supply has caused hyper-inflation in Zimbabwe and has failed to stimulate the Japanese economy, through these actions the central banks in these countries have been acting like a printing press. However it has to be noted that quantitative easing is used when the central banks are left with no other options. The interest rates in the US is close to zero, so QE2 was the last option with the US fed to tackle recession.
The bigger question that the federal reserve has to answer is that- will QE2 bring any significant changes to the economy?
Inflation in the US has been very low. The high unemployment rate has been one of the main reason for these low inflation figures, hence the increased money supply should not cause much problems in the short run. It can be noted that despite the increase in money supply after QE1, the inflation US has been stable. The main reason for stable inflation is because of the falling velocity of the greenback. the money supply has been rising but the falling velocity (circulation of currency) has been the main reason behind the failure to improve the economy.
Banks in the US are sitting on surplus reserves and the increased liquidity should only inflate this surplus reserves. The problem is the lack of confidence to lend. Fear of defaults in the US is the main reason behind the falling velocity of the US dollar. There are not many lucrative investment options in the US and this is forcing the dollar to move out of the US system to much greener pastures in Asia. The increase in supply of dollar is one of the main reason for the rise in emerging market equities and precious metals. The only positive impact that is visible through this policy is that this increase in supply should depreciate the dollar making US exports more attractive. Despite the fall in dollar it is going to be very difficult to compete with the Chinese exports mainly because of the pegged Renminbi. The bond purchase should bring the prices of the US treasury higher, but a depreciating dollar may prevent the central banks from making any significant inflows into the US treasury. The spike in gold prices is a clear indication suggesting that the central banks are looking at better options to invest their surplus reserves.
The emerging markets are witnessing huge amounts of capital inflows, this should further give rise to protectionist policies to prevent the domestic currencies from appreciating. The bigger worry for the emerging economies should be the probability of a bubble in metals and crude. The rise in inflows should fuel inflation, and it may in the end force countries like India too to implement capital controls. Looking at the recent monetary policies of China and South korea it is clear that the countries in Asia are going to use liquidity tightening measures to fight the threats they could face due to QE2. The currency wars between nations seems to have fueled the speculation that the world is moving towards a new exchange rate system, the World Bank president Robert Zoellick too seems to have joined these speculators.
The news flows from the European union continues to disappoint. Analysts predict Ireland could face a potential default. The bond yields have risen by more than 500 basis points. It is just a matter of time before the ECB announces a bail out package for Ireland. The most troubling part about the situation in Europe is that the toxic assets gets transferred from banks to the government and then to mightier organizations like the IMF and the ECB. This may lead to greater problems considering the fact that there may be many more nations in line waiting for a bailout.
It is now going to be interesting to see how the emerging markets tackle inflation worries and how the US and the EU deal with their set of problems.
Friday, October 29, 2010
Currency Wars
The key to recovery is to bring down the unemployment rates. It can be noted that despite the increase in liquidity in the U.S economy there has not been any significant improvement in the unemployment rates. The answers to this lies in China's growing current account surplus and the appreciation in currencies of the emerging economis.
China's growing current account surplus clearly highlights the fact that they have been the biggest beneficiaries of the increased liquidity in the global markets. The boom in the manufacturing sector has enabled China to take advantage of this excess liquidity. However it has to be noted that the exporters too have benefited due to the pegging of the Chinese currency. Analysts and Economists are of the view that the Chinese currency is undervalued by 20%-40%. The fixed currency regime is enabling the Chinese exporters to fight competition from other manufacturers throughout the world. US has been amongst the largest consumers on the Chinese products. This rise in demand for Chinese products is leading to fall in demand for the US manufactured goods and this in turn is one main reasons for rising unemployment in the U.S
US senate is currently considering imposing restrictions on Chinese imports but this issue will be in the back burner till the completion of the mid term election. Imposing restrictions on Chinese imports is not going to be a easy task considering the amount of US debt held by the China. Any restrictions on Chinese imports will also be countered by restrictions on US exports to China. Exports to China has been one of the main reasons for the turnaround of companies like GM and Ford. US treasury secretary Timothy Geithner has been very cautions during the recent G 20 summit. Upper limits for current account surplus for countries like China should enable the US to reduce its trade deficits but this move may not force China to stop pegging it's currency. Growing criticism from US may force China to appreciate its currency, but this appreciation may not factor in the real macro economic picture. It should be interesting to see how the US tackles this issue after the mid term elections. Republicans are expected to do well in this elections, it is going to be interesting to see how the right wingers in the US intend to tackle this problem.
The chairman of the Federal Reserve Ben Bernanke has expressed his interest to infuse more money into the system. These funds will be used to purchase more of the US treasury leading to the surge in liquidity. Increasing supply of dollars should lead to depreciation of dollar against most of the currencies. This surge in liquidity should further lead to the rise in the Emerging market equities and asset prices.
Depreciating Dollar has been a cause of concern for most of the emerging markets. Brazil recently has doubled the tobin tax on capital inflows, Thailand has recently reintroduced the withholding tax. These moves should curtail the currency appreciation of these countries to some extent. RBI has intervened in the currency markets to arrest the Rupee appreciation. However recently the finance minister has openly said that a country like India having a high current account deficit should refrain from imposing taxes on capital inflows. Shankar Acharya (Former advisor to the PM) in his column in business standard wrote that capital inflows should be taxed considering the fact that the inflows may rise after Fed's QE2 announcement causing the Rupee to further appreciate.
In the past many analysts were of the view that P-Notes were (partially) banned in 2007 mainly to bring down the capital inflows. This move did not go down well with the FII's. Similarly any moves to tax capital inflows may hamper the confidence of the FII's. Since we are a capital importing country we must not bring in any reforms that will hurt the confidence of the FII's.
Considering the above case it can be said that the finance ministry is taking the right step by not taking any actions against capital inflows. However appreciating Rupee is surely a cause of concern for exporters. Therefore RBI intervention is a must considering the fact that taxing capital inflows may not be positive for the country. Slowing down Rupee appreciations should enable exporters to compete with countries like Brazil and other emerging economies.
Looking at the recent events it can be said that G 20 has become very important in today's context. It should be interesting to see how the global economies intend to bring an end to the recent currency wars. Fed's bond purchase plan should help RBI determine it's role in the currency markets. To sum it up I would say that wars are now being fought using paper.
Thursday, October 21, 2010
The left turn to default.
Signs of recovery are very much visible, but the bigger question is - "How did we land in this mess?"
Let's first look at all the countries that have leading contributors to this mess.
P.I.G.S is an acronym that refers to the economies of Portugal, Italy, Greece and Spain mainly in matters relating to sovereign default. Mismanagement of funds has been the main reason behind this crisis. Let's take a look at the debt to GDP ratios of these nations.
Italy tops the list with 116%
Greece-113%
Portugal-77%
Spain-54%
Italy's debt to GDP ratio was 109% in the year 2001 and it has risen to 116% in the year 2009. Silvio Berlusconi has been the Prime Minister for a major period of time in the last decade. Despite the right of center reforms Silvio's government has failed to bring down the public debt, the fiscal deficit too has gone up due to the stimulus provided to the economy. Silvio's government has introduced many austerity measures to bring down the deficits but there has been growing protests against these measures.
The bailout package prevented Greece from defaulting. The public debt rose to such high levels due to reckless spending by the socialist governments that were in power in the last decade. Figures were fudged due to which the problem was unnoticed. Portugal and Spain have been governed by socialist governments in the last decade.
Barring Italy it can be observed that all the other three countries were governed by Socialist governments in the last decade. One of the major problems faced by the countries ruled by socialistic governments is that they fail to cap the growing public debt and fiscal deficits. Socialism mainly deals with government funding most of the social sector schemes which in turn helps in the growth in the economy, but unfortunately most of these governments end up misusing the socialistic policies to garner votes. Socialistic governments generally resort to unnecessary spending which ends up inflating the fiscal deficits and the public debt, but such schemes tend to have a positive impact on the electorate in the short term, and end up damaging the economy in the long run. Several austerity measures must be undertaken to bring down the deficits and the debts. While undertaking such austerity measures the government is forced to cut down most of its social expenditure. This causes widespread protests by the people since they have been pampered by these schemes for years together.
Looking at the past it can be observed that countries that followed socialistic policies have not been very successful and the recent crisis in Europe too suggests the same.
Indian preamble says that India is a Socialistic Republic. Gandhi family has not distanced itself from Nehruvian Socialism. It may be a cause of concern but with the economy growing at such high growth rates it should not cause any problems in the near future, but it is necessary for the literate voters in India to understand the problems the country may face due to socialism and reckless spending of the government. India's debt to GDP ratio stands at 54%. It is higher when compared to most of the emerging economies, however >8% economic growth should help us bring it down. To conclude I would say that a government following conservative policies would prevent problems caused due to excessive spendings in the long run.
Tuesday, August 3, 2010
The Deregulation Gimmick
As per the Kirit Parikh committee report the benefits of deregulation of oil prices far exceeds the pain the society has to bear for the spike in oil prices. The oil marketing companies should reduce the losses which in turn should increase the revenue receipts for the government and decrease the expenditure. This increase in revenues/reduced expenditure can be utilized to fund the various social sector schemes undertaken by the government.
Many may agree with the above analysis but there are a few facts that we need to consider before we give the credit to the government. Let's calculate the cost price for 1 liter of petrol.
CRUDE OIL Rs. 22.5 p/l (@$80 per barrel )
Refining cost Rs. 3.5 p/l (@$0.07 refining cost)
Marketining expense Rs. 1.05 p/l
Shipping & Transport Rs. 6.00 p/l
---------------
Total Rs. 33.05 p/l
After going through these facts we may realize that never in the last decade we have paid less than Rs. 40 for 1 liter of petrol. What's even more interesting is that despite the subsidies we have been paying more than the cost price of petrol (Cost price as per $80 barrel.However avg. crude oil price in this decade should be lesser than $80 per barrel).
The reason why we have been paying such high prices for petrol is because of the heavy taxes levied on it. Here is how the cost price post tax looks like
CRUDE OIL Rs. 22.5 p/l (@$80 per barrel )
Refining cost Rs. 3.5 p/l (@$0.07 refining cost)
Marketining expense Rs. 1.05 p/l
Shipping & Transport Rs. 6.00 p/l
Excise Duty Rs.14.35 p/l
CESS Rs. 0.43 p/l
VAT Rs. 3.50-5.50 p/l
customs Rs. 2.64 p/l
-----------------
Total price Rs. 53.97-55.97 p/l
It can be concluded that prior to deregulation the tax paid on petrol was greater than the subsidy provided by the government. Interestingly except for VAT all the other taxes are under the purview of the Central Government. It is going to be difficult for the state governments to reduce VAT on petrol, since there are not many heads under which they can make up for the loss they will face after reducing VAT on petrol. Hence blaming the state governments would be unfair. Deregulating without making any changes to the existing tax structure is surely going to be very unfair on the common man.
This high rates of taxation is in turn used to compensate for the under-recoveries arising from sale of kerosene and L.P.G. It is going to be difficult if not impossible to sell LPG and kerosene at market price, however it would have been better if the prices would have been hiked as per the recommendation of the committee. The government lacks political will and the guts required to touch the LPG and kerosene prices.
Looking at the government's functioning it can be said that the entire act of deregulation was mainly undertaken to increase the revenues to reduce the deficit. If this entire process of deregulation has been undertaken to reduce the deficit then I am quite sure that subsidies will be re-introduced by the U.P or L.S elections or by the next oil bubble (The government would have managed to bring down the deficits by then). The biggest beneficiaries are the oil marketing companies. However its very early to comment, its better to make conclusions only after the government meets its promise of deregulating the diesel prices and raising the LPG and kerosene prices. Finally the timing was very interesting. Bihar is the only state to go for elections this year, Congress surely is not expecting much from Bihar. So going by this logic will the government find an appropriate time to deregulate diesel and raise the prices for L.P.G and kerosene???
Tuesday, April 27, 2010
THE RED INDIANS
Naxals claim to be fighting for the rights of the poor in the rural areas of India,but the question is-Do the rural people really consider the naxals their messiah???
In the last decade the naxal recruits have increased tremendously.These recruits are mainly from the rural areas.Some of them fight for the ideology and most of them fight for the money.However it is certain that naxals do receive public support.Jharkhand CM Shibu Soren won elections in few constituencies with the help of naxals.Nitish Kumar has always been against the use of force on naxals.Recently Railway Minister Mamta Banerjee went on record to say that there were no naxals in Lalghar.There were rumors circulating in the media that Mamta Banerjee had sought help from the naxals to carry out her protests in Singur against the Tata's.The reason why naxals have been receiving support from these politicians is because of their popularity amongst the locals. Hence we cant outrightly reject the possibility of naxal's receiving support from the poor in rural areas.Naxals have been targeting the corporates and they have been vocal against the illegal mining activities carried out in the backward areas.Their presence has been observed in areas where illegal mining activities are widely carried out.In the past they have been attacking few industrial units in Bihar and Orrisa,they also had kidnapped a group of Posco executives who visited India after signing a MOU with the Orissa Government.Naxal ideologues are of the view that the presence of these corporates would hamper the lives of the tribal people.The naxals claim that they are against the signing of these MOU's which would eventually lead to the depletion of mineral resources and forest cover making life difficult for the tribals in these areas.In all debates it has been clearly evident that the so-called human right activists bring all these arguments forward to defend the maoists.
The naxal sympathizers must understand that these are just tactics used by the naxals to prevent any kind of development in these backward areas.MP's and MLA's refrain from visiting their constituencies because of their fear of the naxals,this prevents any possibility of carrying out developmental activities in these backward areas.People in these areas are generally isolated from the outside world,and eventually they are forced to support the naxals due to the lack of availability of external help.
So therefore it has to be understood that eliminating naxals is the only way through which developmental activities can be carried out in these areas.The CRPF jawans and the local police should be provided with proper training,logistics and weapons to fight the naxals.It is necessary for the CRPF and the police force to work together,this clearly did no happen in dantewada.It should be a collective responsibility of the state and center to eliminate these anti-nationals.Air force should be used for logistical support since these areas are highly inaccessible.Post-Dantewada its evident that negotiations with the naxals should be of no use,naxals may probably use the cease-fire time to strengthen their army.The government should look into the channels through which these naxals receive their funding,it has been widely speculated that they receive their funding from China.This angle must be seriously probed into,because China can use these maoists to fight a proxy war against India,and of course lets not forget that the maoists in Nepal have openly said that they would support the Indian naxals.The Indian government should take the right steps to prevent the naxals from seeking help from the other side of the border.In a recent article in the DNA it was mentioned that there have been instances in the past where Christian Missionaries operating in the remote areas have provided support to the naxals.This probably justifies the naxal aggression against the RSS social workers.
It has been encouraging to watch the opposition parties promising unconditional support for government on this issue,but sadly there seems to be difference of opinion amongst the members of the UPA.The recent article by Digvijay Singh in the Economic Times clearly highlights this difference in opinion,Mamta has always been against the use of force against the naxals.The face of the Gandhi's are always brought forward when it comes to fiscal spending,but unfortunately when it comes to issues such as naxailsm and terrorism the Gandhi family chooses to remain silent.Sad that media never questions the "YUVRAJ"of Indian politics on these issues,but I am quite sure that if he is asked questions on this issue,he would go ahead and blame the system-conveniently forgetting the fact that the system has been designed by his great grand father,grand mother and his father.The reason I have brought Rahul Gandhi into picture is because it is very well known that Digvijay singh has been Rahul Gandhi's mentor.Digvijay through his article in ET has asked the government to negotiate with the maoists,whereas P.Chidambaram has initiated the operation Green Hunt.The whole country would like to know which side the Gandhi family is in,and as always the Gandhi family chooses to remain silent on issues which would fail to garner any political mileage-"Power without Responsibility"
To conclude I would only say that it is time the government gets its act together on this issue.The government must speaking in an united voice.I am saddened by the recent difference of opinion between ManiShankarAiyyer and Digvijay Singh v/s P.Chidambaram.
Monday, April 5, 2010
The Dragon Tactics
China undervalues its currency,this makes the Chinese exports to the US cheaper.This has been one of the main reasons the Chinese manufacturing industry has flourished.In India we often come across reports of the textile industries being badly hit due to Rupee appreciation,This is because the Rupee is not a fixed currency(however Nepalese rupee is pegged against the Indian Rupee),R.B.I enters the currency markets generally to reduce the volatility,to reduce the losses for the importers and the exporters.The RBI perceives that long run equilibrium is different from the actual values.However in the past we have seen RBI allowing the Rupee to appreciate and depreciate up to10% over a period of 12 months(we have seen the rupee fall from 39 to 44 in 2009),and I am of the view that these actions are quite justified in case of a developing nation,comparing the fluctuations in the Yuan and Rupee it can be said that RBI has not been as aggressive as the People's bank of China.We have to appreciate RBI for letting the market forces determine the movement in the Rupee.
Having said that we have to understand the fact that a fixed Yuan actually benefits the exporters in China,and therefore may have a negative impact on the exporters in India.For instance when it comes to pricing we can say that the Chinese textile industry has an upper hand over the Indian textile industry because of the fixed Yuan and the floating Rupee.Unfortunately Indian government has always been in the back foot when it comes to raising its voice against China.
For a brief period the Yuan was allowed to appreciate,and during this period the Yuan appreciated by 20%.Most analysts today are of the view that Yuan is undervalued by 10%-50%.So if the central bank stops pegging we can say that the Chinese manufacturers will be forced to raise their prices in proportion with the appreciation in Yuan.
Recently many senators in the US congress have been protesting against this policy of China.A group of senators in the US are planing to bring in a legislation which would impose taxes on Chinese imports.Increase in Chinese imports has made life difficult for the local US manufacturers,this legislation should certainly help the US manufacturers compete with their Chinese counterparts.However any aggressive step taken against China will have a negative consequence on the US considering the fact that China is currently sitting on 2.4 trillion of foreign reserve,most of which is US T-bills.This is one of the main reasons why the recent statements by the treasury secretary T.Geithner does not sound threatening towards China.It is going to be interesting to see if US is going to accuse China for being a currency manipulator considering the fact that China is currently having T-bills worth trillions.Let us also not forget that the US consumers are the major beneficiaries of these low priced Chinese products.So any action against China can potentially affect the US bond market and the US consumers.
Coming back to China-to prevent the Yuan from appreciating the Chinese central bank sells Yuan.The Chinese central bank may increase the supply of Yuan to prevent it from appreciating,this may in turn lead to a rise in inflation in China.Looking at the broader picture we can actually say that the Chinese central bank is helping the Chinese manufacturers sell their products in the US markets,but what is unfortunate is that these benefits does not get transferred from the employers to the employees.Workforce in China continues to be exploited to meet the rising demand,and we come across cases of workforce exploitation in China on a regular basis.
Considering all this it should be interesting to see how the US and China deal with this issue.
Wednesday, March 24, 2010
The US-PAK nuclear deal
Past has shown us that Pakistan has a poor history when it comes to safeguarding its nuclear secrets,despite this well known fact we are seeing the Americans willing to sign a nuclear treaty with Pakistan.One of the main reasons for American willingness is because of the war in Afghanistan.The Obama administration plans to increase the troops deployed in Afghanistan.In such a scenario US would be needing Pakistan's help,besides it is going to be difficult to win the war on terrorism without Pakistan's help.Pakistan in the past has expressed its displeasure over the Indo-US nuclear deal.So this move is mainly aimed to satisfy the ruling Pakistani administration.
This deal should certainly increase the security concerns of several nations,and lets not discount the possibility of this technology falling into the hands of the terrorists.US and Pakistan have been allies since Pakistan's independence in 1947.Similarly during the post independence period India and the Soviet Union were seen as great allies(mainly due to Nehru's inclination towards socialism),But we had seen a dramatic change in foreign policy when the NDA government came into power.We had actually seen the Vajpayee Govt. taking the initiative for the Indo-US nuclear deal.It was during the NDA regime that we had seen the Indian Govt negotiating with the US.
Recently US ambassador rejected the possibility of US providing access to Headley,US may prevent India getting the custody of Headley since it would help India prove the involvement of Pakistan in 26/11.Giving custody of Headley to India can potentially hamper the US-PAK relation.
Coming back to the US-PAK nuclear deal,I doubt if Pakistan would receive the support of the nations in IAEA due to its poor history when it comes to safeguarding it nuclear secrets.
This is my first post on foreign policy/politics.I often get criticized for being biased towards a particular ideology,which prevented me from making posts on these topics.Please comment if you feel this post is biased.
Sunday, March 7, 2010
Its all Greek and goldman
Saturday, February 27, 2010
BUDGET 2010
Saturday, February 20, 2010
INDIA-the socialist democratic republic
Thursday, February 18, 2010
The Travesty of Judicial System in case of Quattrocchi(by amogh pathak)
The Quattrocchi saga is a blot on the Congress led UPA government--which it cannot wash away. I don’t recollect any incident where the government has actually went out of the way to save any individual (of course there was a selfish motive though).The dropping of the cases against Q was bound to happen .First it was the defreezing of Quattrocchi’s accounts. Second the govt. facilitated the withdrawing of Interpol’s red corner notice. Third it gave the final clean chit to the Italian corrupt fraudmaster ‘Q’ by dropping all charges against him. In this whole saga what comes through is the proximity of Mr. Quattrocchi to 10, Janpath. The sum alleged may be small as compared to the huge corruption that prevails in the Indian political arena. But the way it was done and the underhand methods used so blatantly to get Quattrocchi walk free is something which cannot be easily explained off.
The questions that actually aghast me are :- Why was the UPA government under Mrs Sonia Gandhi so keen on freeing ‘Q’? What is the relationship of ‘Q’ to the first family? Why did the law minister sent an envoy to the UK to defreeze his account keeping the PM in the dark? Why was Quattrocchi not extradited from Malaysia, when the Central government did say that it was a fit case for extradition? Why did the then Solicitor General Mr. Gopal Subramanium withdrew case against Italian Businessmen Ottavio Quattrocchi when CBI had once suggested a strong case existed? What happened between then-with a strong case in existence?
I think it all started when Margaret Alva was the Minister in charge of Personnel, the Congress allowed Quattrocchi to sneak out of the country? 64 crores may be peanuts for the ministers and the first family- the fact remains that the Congress strongly helped the fleeing and then the freeing of Mr. ‘Q’. If there was no case then why had ‘Q’ not appeared for the questions, faced the charges and cleared himself? Instead he was running as a refugee from country to country. The role of Congress is surely a suspect. It has brought disgrace and disrepute to the country and its investigation agencies and made a farce of our whole justice system.
All the big tamasha of sleeping in a dalit’s house and sharing a night meal with them, travelling in local trains in Mumbai etc. is big propaganda for Rahul. This is sheer hypocrisy. If the Congress and Rahul really feels the plight of the poorest of the poor then I think Mr. Rahul is smart enough to understand that one night’s dinner is not gonna suffice the cause. You really require people like Baba Amte, Amritanandamayi Devi, Mother Teressa etc. to actually bring a real change. It takes a lot of courage to fight corruption because corruption is the root cause for all the ills. Is one night stay of Mr. Rahul Gandhi going to actually eradicate the poverty of the poor people? If really Rahul and his mother believe in eradication of poverty then Quatrrocchi’s case should have been different.
At the end I would say it is not the 64 crores but the message that they will go upto any level to save people who are close to them; the government led by Mrs Sonia Gandhi will not hesitate to make a farce of this whole judicial system and block its process.
“JAI HIND, JAI MAHARASHTRA”
Friday, February 12, 2010
The math behind the farmer suicides(part2)
Thursday, February 4, 2010
The math behind the farmer suicides(part1)
Monday, February 1, 2010
Mercy for Cricket Bowlers…(By RAHUL TANK)
Mercy for Cricket Bowlers…
The Cricketing fraternity is shocked by the latest Ball Tampering incident by (Famous for all wrong reasons) Shahid Afridi (man who thought he would secure his place in this year’s IPL but thanks to Almighty he is not there). Only God knows whether he was smelling,chewing or licking the ball. This was an absurd and never heard before act . He said he really smelled the ball… apparently, with his teeth. He later said he wanted to win the match for Pakistan and by tampering the ball he could get the wickets….Afridi, who was 19 years old for at least two years or more, has been the bad boy of Pakistani cricket for some time. He has been involved in a number of dressing room clashes – physical, not just verbal. Making him captain is like making Saddam Hussian, the Head of World Peace Movement. Now the real Question is why are the cricketers indulging in the practice of tampering the ball? Why there is a need for them to make such unfair practices in order to get wickets and win the match.
According to me BALL TAMPERING (It is an action in which a fielder illegally alters the condition of the ball.) should be legalized in All forms of Cricket. I believe, Batsman have an edge over bowlers in Cricket.Rules such as power play and free hits,makes the batsman's job easier. But I pity the bowlers as they have to maintain their Line and length. The margin for error is very less for bowlers, so if batsman has the option of power play, let the bowlers also have the option of using the ball as they want. As a result there would be a fair competition in the cricket field. The irony is that ball tampering is usually linked to reverse swing, so bowlers can make maximum use of it and which in turn should make it difficult for the batsman to score. Also batsman use various types of bats in terms of, size ( thickness) and weight to score runs,then why there is only one type of ball being used by the Bowlers?? so let them make the best use of the ball i.e. tamper the ball according to the situation..
So I strongly favour the bowlers and want ICC to legalized Ball Tampering